1 (877) 7 PATCEO

contactus@patentceo.com

Home
  • Specializing in US Patent Filing & Prosecution
  • Simple Devices, Medical, Software, Hardware
  • Former USPTO Examiner on Staff
  • Cost Effective & Efficient
Patentability Criterion
 
For an invention to become patentable it must meet certain criteria:
  • Patentability comprises the necessary characteristics that an invention must have in order for it to pass muster as a legally patentable innovation. First, they must fall into one of the statutory classes of patents.  Additionally, there are two other main characteristics that an invention must have for it to be rendered patentable. Namely, that the invention must be new (novelty) as well as having no direct or indirect precedent (non-obviousness) with reference to the existing set of technological art.

  • Novelty means that the same invention must not exist anywhere prior to applicant's creation of it.

  • Non-Obviousness is a somewhat murkier factor in the patent world. Put simply, one of ordinary skill in the art of the application's invention must determine that the invention would not have been obvious to make or use the invention. This is determined by patent office personnel conducting a prior art search and analyzing the state of the technological art. If the sum total of the prior can not be combined to demonstrate an obviousness rejection nor a logical rationale be found for the same then an application passes to issuance.

Directory

GENERAL
1.877.772.8236

BROWARD COUNTY
954-240-0799

JACKSONVILLE
904.352.1811

MIAMI / BRICKELL / CORAL GABLES
305.517.1277

PALM BEACH COUNTY
561.536.5636

ORLANDO
407.392.1933

SARASOTA / BRADENTON
941.914.9978

ST PETERSBURG / TAMPA
813.964.3055


Patent CEO City Pages:




 

  • EMAIL

  • General Inquiries:

  • General Manager:

 

The Patent Application Process

Our primary business is the writing of patent applications for utility patents such as machines, articles of manufacture, methods, chemical compositions, plants and so forth.  It should be understood from the outset that as registered patent attorneys and patent agents all information is held in the strictest of confidence as required by United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) regulations. In order to understand your concept, the patent process typically begins by the collection of various useful items of information regarding the general nature of your invention and your goals.  Once we have sufficient information you can choose the type of application suitable to your business objectives.

Choosing a Non-Provisional or Provisional Application

Applicants have the option of choosing between two different types of utility applications, namely, a non-provisional and a provisional application.  A non-provisional application will be examined for patentability and its claims will be vetted against the prior art within the selected and related technical fields.  When a non-provisional application is allowed by the patent examiner and becomes a patent, it has a lifecycle of twenty years from the earliest priority date.  This date extends from previous applications upon which the issuing application can claim a co-pending chain of common subject matter.

In contrast to the non-provisional application, applicants can also elect to file a provisional patent which in and of itself can never become a patent.  However, it does provide a one year grace period for filing a complete non-provisional utility application.  At first, this option is less expensive then a regular application; but since a provisional patent never matures into a regular patent, an applicant will have to cover the expenses of a provisional application and later in the year the cost of a regular application.  Patent CEO will deduct a reasonable amount of the provisional application cost from the later price structure of the regular application.  Choose this option only if you are not sure about filing your regular non-provisional application because your are still experimenting, modifying the concept, seeking financial backers, testing your product or similar types of situations.

Contract Signature

Once you have elected the application type and we have collected sufficient technical information, a contract is signed covering various items pertinent to the application process.  Among these are a description of the specific work to be performed, time period for its completion, responsibilities of each party and any unique characteristics required by the situation.  Typically, we accept a fifty percent fee before commencement of the work and fifty percent once a first written specification is complete but not yet filed at the appropriate government agency such as the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), and other national patent offices.

Drafting

Getting a correct set of drawings is critical to your invention as it forms the framework of the written description.  Thus, it is imperative that you work with us to make changes early on when the draftsman comes back with a first set of drawings.  When an applicant is careful to make necessary corrections and or changes to the drawings in the first set of drawings, this prevents later unnecessary delays and potential cost overruns.  Patent CEO works with several draftsman to provide the best quality drawings for your utility and design patents.  Once you have approved the drawings we can proceed to creation of your written description. 

Written Specification

Then we will proceed forward to the writing of your concept including the Background of the Invention, Summary of the Invention, Listing of Drawings, Detailed Description of the Embodiments and Claims.  The claims represent the boundaries of your invention as broadly viewed in light of your written specification.  After you have finally reviewed your written specification and drawings and approved both, we will collect other auxiliary documents and arrange for the payment of fees and the transmission of all paperwork to the patent office you have selected.  These include but are not limited to: Declaration(s), Power of Attorney(s) and more.  These will be collected and forwarded to the appropriate agency electronically.

Waiting on the Examiner

Once we have filed the application electronically, a legal instruments examiner reviews all documents and notifies us as to their initial acceptance.  Then the waiting game begins; since the USPTO has thousands of patent examiner and manages a workload of hundreds of thousands of pending cases their is a backlog of applications in the patent docketing system.  Depending upon the art unit and or technology center your application is classified in the application can have anywhere from six months to a year or more of delay in examination.  This is internal to the patent office and we have no control over this.

Examiner Action and Response

When the application moves up on the docket, the patent examiner will carefully review it for various characteristics primarily focusing on the existing prior art.  The prior art is all disclosed inventions in this or a foreign country that are closely related to your invention.  Having conducted a thorough investigation of this material, the patent examiner will send us an office action having an opinion either a) passing the application to allowance and issue; or b) demonstrating why the application is not allowable based upon existing law.  Typically, the examiner will discuss whether it exists verbatim in the prior art or whether it is believed to be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.  This latter opinion can be somewhat irritating to applicants because it can seem like it is a forced reconstruction of your invention with dissimilar technology that at times makes no apparent sense.

When the patent examiner allows an application, an issue fee is required for permitting the application to be printed and officially become a patent.  If the office action does not allow the application then we will take a look at the specifics of the opinion.  Then after reviewing the patent examiner action, we will provide you with a cost quote based upon a proposed response to his opinion and any items that need action therein.  If you decide to respond, we will prepare an amendment and or a request for reconsideration that fully responds to his most recent action; in particular, the response treats each point of the examiner action 1) delineating errors in the logic used in the opinion and 2) highlighting relevant case law that benefits your case.  Once filed, the amendment and or request for reconsideration is forwarded to the examiner and we will receive a response in several months.

Upon receipt of the response the examiner will take it up as his docket permits and analyze the arguments and changes made therein.  At this point the examiner has the options of  a) allowing the application; b) finalizing the rejection; c) explaining how to change the application to make it allowable by providing insights into how this can come about, either by objecting to dependent claims that would be allowable or even suggesting language that would make it so.  However, if no agreement can be reached, the applicant has the options of 1) requesting continued examination (RCE); 2) appealing the decision to an appeal board; 3) continuing the case with a continuation in part adding new subject matter to the application.

Optional Search

If you have conducted your own search on patents.google.com and found similar technologies, do not lose heart.  Before there was the disc brake there was the drum brake and before that the hand brake; the fact that they solve similar problems does not mean that yours is not the more marketable product.  Additionally, invention tends to be something that evolves with minor changes that are just as valuable over time as an enormous breakthrough that may not be easily scalable by the original inventor or product developer.

We can also conduct searches on your idea but because of the enormous number of patents it is sometimes like finding a needle in a haystack.  Having conducted hundreds if not thousands of searches we can find what your looking for in the USPTO database.

You should understand, however, that there are many countries that have patent databases and if an applicant in any of those countries (Japan, Germany, etcetera) files over there and not over here there application will not show up in the US catalog.  Therefore, it is our opinion that it is best to file in the US with or without a search.

Exemplary Fees

The following list illustrates the current suggested prices for various services.  They are based upon a case of regular complexity and length of about 20 pages.  These fees are subject to change without notice.  Please get your FIXED PRICE QUOTATION today.  Additional costs for your patent include USPTO filing and draftsman's fees and are NOT included below:

Utility Patent Application Attorney / Agent Fees.

Fixed Provisional Application - $2400-3000+.
Fixed Non Provisional Application Range of Fees - $4000 - $6000+
Fixed Responses to Substantial Office Actions / Appeals - $2500+

Design Patent Application Attorney / Agent Fees

Fixed Design Application $2400+

Price Guide - USPTO Fees (Government)

MICRO ENTITY STATUS: The Patent Office has created three tiers of pricing for its products.  To qualify for a micro entity or less the current requirement as of 2018 is a gross income of less than 177,000.
Micro Entity Non Provisional (Filing Search Exam) $430
Small Entity Non Provisional (Filing Search Exam) $860
Micro Entity Provisional Filing $70
Small Entity Provisional $140
Micro Design Filing Fee $240
Small Design Filing Fees $480

Price Guide - Agent Fees

Novelty Search $1200+
 

Utility Patents

cover functions and or unique structures performing those functions.  Typical example are manufactured articles, compositions of matter, machines or processes. Some examples of the foregoing are a shoe (article of manufacture), a recipe (composition of matter), an airplane engine (machine) and a computer program running a robot (process).

Design Patents

cover the ornamental appearance of an item.  They differ from utility patents in that the way an item looks is being patented.  This is further emphasized in that the claim in a design patent is made up essentially of drawings.  Utility patents on the other hand are directed to function and structure.  
Copyright 2019 © Patent CEO, LLC  |  Blog
About   |  Service  |  Sample  |  Glossary  |  Contact